<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just a few things</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/just-a-few-things-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/just-a-few-things-3/</link>
	<description>Where Intellectuals and Rednecks foregather.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:18:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cruisin2</title>
		<link>http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/just-a-few-things-3/#comment-26779</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cruisin2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/?p=6524#comment-26779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DavenportWestEnder,
Thanks for stopping by.

 Nitrous55,
Those in Washington do have a way of make less sound like more. We still favor a flat tax that ALL pay regardless of income.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DavenportWestEnder,<br />
Thanks for stopping by.</p>
<p> Nitrous55,<br />
Those in Washington do have a way of make less sound like more. We still favor a flat tax that ALL pay regardless of income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitrous55</title>
		<link>http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/just-a-few-things-3/#comment-26775</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nitrous55]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/?p=6524#comment-26775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Rush&#039;s show, it was pointed out that the Buffett Tax is on ordinary income.  Ordinary income is not what makes up Buffett&#039;s income.  He still would pay less.  

Besides, they project that the tax would bring in $5 Billion whereas a 1% across the board spending cut would save $30 Billion.  Nothing but smoke and mirrors.  Trying to make people feel good rather than try to solve the problem.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Rush&#8217;s show, it was pointed out that the Buffett Tax is on ordinary income.  Ordinary income is not what makes up Buffett&#8217;s income.  He still would pay less.  </p>
<p>Besides, they project that the tax would bring in $5 Billion whereas a 1% across the board spending cut would save $30 Billion.  Nothing but smoke and mirrors.  Trying to make people feel good rather than try to solve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavenportWestEnder</title>
		<link>http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/2012/04/10/just-a-few-things-3/#comment-26771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DavenportWestEnder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cruisin2.wordpress.com/?p=6524#comment-26771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just became aware of your blog a few weeks ago from Jim Fisher.  I now read it daily.  Occasionally I browse the comments.  For the most part I am in agreement with what you say.  Interesting mix of topics.

I agree about Buffett.  If he is all for &#039;the rich&#039; being taxed at a higher rate, he should not fight so hard using his tax attorneys to not pay what the government is arguing that he owes in back taxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just became aware of your blog a few weeks ago from Jim Fisher.  I now read it daily.  Occasionally I browse the comments.  For the most part I am in agreement with what you say.  Interesting mix of topics.</p>
<p>I agree about Buffett.  If he is all for &#8216;the rich&#8217; being taxed at a higher rate, he should not fight so hard using his tax attorneys to not pay what the government is arguing that he owes in back taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
